PERSONAL PROTECTION:
Concepts for survival in the street
by Andrew Williams, Rolf Clausnitzer and David Peterson
Personal Protection is a relatively new phenomenon in
the field of self defence. In fact, it represents a radical departure from the
somewhat limited vision presented by most traditional self-defence systems.
It is inspired by and based on two major influences:
1. The work done by two very respected and experienced (in terms
of both tournament performance and real life confrontations) British martial
artists, Geoff Thompson and Peter Consterdine; and
2. The highly efficient and practical Chinese martial art of
Wing Chun Kuen which, interestingly, Messrs. Thompson and Consterdine
acknowledge in their video series, "The Pavement Arena", as having had
a major influence on their own self protection philosophy and methods.
Wing Chun is a major Chinese martial art or system that is unparalleled
in its suitability for today's urban environment. It is radically different
in its general approach from that of most traditional martial arts, as it is
not reliant on strength, balletic poise, acrobatic movements, or a complexity
of often flamboyant techniques. Instead of being technique oriented and requiring
students to learn by rote an endless variety of movements (which often result
in a mental "log jam" in real life situations), Wing Chun is based on a clear
understanding of fighting concepts and strategies, expressed via a minimal number
of techniques which meet the basic criteria of simplicity, directness
and efficiency.
Although widely believed to have been founded and developed by
a Buddhist nun, Ng Mui, and her female pupil, Yim Wing Chun,
about 200 hundred years ago, Wing Chun has evolved over time via a process of
"natural selection", with a continual discarding of superfluous, complex and
ineffective techniques and movements. It is the system that the legendary Bruce
Lee used as the foundation of his own combat philosophy of Jeet Kune
Do, and has become the most influential style of Kung Fu, allowing even
traditional Karate and other Kung Fu practitioners to reappraise and enhance
their own skills and techniques.
Successfully tested in real "no-holds barred" fights against
numerous other styles in Hong Kong in the 1950's and early 1960's by outstanding
students of Grandmaster Yip Man, such as the late Sifu Wong Shun Leung
and Sifu Wang Kiu, Wing Chun is considered to be one of the most, if
not the most practical and efficient martial arts for use in today's increasingly
violent environment. In simple terms, Wing Chun is the "Science of Street
Fighting", designed solely for the purpose of surviving an attack by being
a better attacker than one's assailant. Hence it forms the perfect basis for
the concept of Personal Protection.
It should be made clear at the outset that this document is only
a basic guideline, not intended to be, or taken for, a comprehensive and definitive
work. For example, it does not purport to supply the reader with an in-depth
examination of an attacker's psychology. Nor is it a typical "how to" manual,
detailing specific, complicated self-defence techniques in make-believe, often
unrealistic situations. It is certainly not intended to lead the reader through
a sequence of events culminating in the inevitable limiting solution.
It is the sincere wish of the authors, however, to encourage
readers to take a closer and more realistic look at the concept of personal
security, a good understanding of which, under the guidance of an experienced
and competent instructor, can provide a sound basis for developing a practical
and effective method of self protection. It should be stressed, of course, in
view of the complexity of the subject, that this article is not to be taken
as a "quick fix", ready-made set of rules for instant implementation. Considerable
analysis, discussion, and testing are called for, as any one of the main ideas
or principles outlined could itself become the theme for an entire seminar.
Further, a particular idea may not automatically fit in with your philosophy
of fighting or it may need to be modified accordingly.
It should be pointed out at this stage that, as few of us can
rely on great physical strength, it is vital that the instructor has a clear
understanding of power generation utilising an informed understanding of exercise
methodologies and biomechanics, thus enabling the students to realise their
full striking potential. An open mind is called for, far removed from the "arm-lock"
mentality* of many martial arts systems, not only to get the most out of the
concepts presented in this paper, but also to get the best out of those inherent
in all martial arts.
Personal Protection is not a sport, but a serious approach
to preparing oneself for potential real life threats. To quote an ancient Chinese
sage, Li Chuan, "War is a grave matter. One is apprehensive lest men
embark on it without due reflection". A skilful fighter is one who is able to
triumph over his or her opponent by having a deep understanding of their own
capabilities and potential. Therefore, the proper training is essential, training
that prepares you not only physically, but mentally and emotionally as well.
As stated at the beginning of this article, Personal Protection
is certainly a departure from the countless "self defence" instruction methods,
widely depicted, showing attackers in unrealistic, static, even clumsily inept
poses, telegraphing their movements, and "allowing" themselves to be handled
with impunity by the defender. And it is certainly not an exploration of the
dramatic scenario so popular with idealistic and inexperienced instructors in
countless martial arts clubs around
the world, where the two antagonists conduct a gentlemanly bout
to decide who is the better man, two noble warriors observing a set of rules
and a pattern of ritualistic behaviours, who by mutual consent begin a dignified
exchange of technique.
*ie: the mentality that many martial artists exhibit, in that
they will try to make a technique fit the situation (eg: try to put their opponent
in an arm-lock), no matter what, becoming, in the words of Master Sifu Wong
Shun Leung, "...a slave to their art, instead of a master of it".
In the street, the classical depiction of a defender representing
a particular martial art squaring off against an attacker from another system
is seldom, if ever, encountered. Violence can erupt with little or no sign of
threat. And this eruption is usually in the form of a vicious, spiteful act,
carried out with deadly intent, with no regard for the rules of civilised conduct
and little, if any, resemblance to the set piece duel in the dojo or kwoon.
In the street, almost every conceivable weapon, from keys and cutting weapons
to baseball bats and house bricks, is used to inflict pain, serious injury,
and even death. And it is here that you are more likely to be savagely bitten
by a crazed attacker than to be stopped by a beautifully executed roundhouse
kick to the head.
It should also be noted that few of us these days have the "luxury"
of testing our fighting skills in real combat situations. As such, we are usually
unable to duplicate the enormous amounts of emotional pressure that accompany
a real fight in the practise of sparring or ‘Chi Sau’. Both lack the physical
and verbal aggression so often used by remorseless street opponents.
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
Attack Scenarios
Most acts of violence and physical abuse are carried out in familiar
surroundings, by people one knows. They can be long term, and often occur in
the home, perpetrated by a family member or so-called friend, and if you are
unable or unwilling to confront these cowardly individuals, your best long term
defence is to use the laws that are in place to protect you.
Not all attacks, however, occur in the home and not all the perpetrators
are known. They are usually carried out by vicious, cowardly individuals and/or
people seeking monetary gain. It has been said that 99% of these attacks are
opportunistic, ie. they are not pre-planned but occur at the time because the
"conditions" seem right to the attacker(s).
Environmentally, there are two "basic" ways in which you may
be attacked. Firstly, your attacker can strike suddenly from a concealed position,
utilising the element of surprise. The object is to catch you unawares and subject
you to enormous pressure, mentally, physically and, most importantly, emotionally.
The sudden change in your emotional state is effected by the body’s reaction
to threat, which is normally experienced as fear. If this reaction is uncontrolled,
you will limit or waste your chance to react or retaliate in an effective manner,
whether that is to run or to stand and fight. The attacker can use a multitude
of situations in which to stage an ambush. This would of course dictate that
one needs a highly developed sense of subliminal threat awareness in order to
minimise the possibility of being attacked and/or surprised. As it is improbable,
however, that one could remain vigilant all of the time, the next best option
is to train in such a way as to develop a high degree of control over your body’s
reaction to threat. This type of instruction requires a high degree of realism
and honesty within your training regime, never accepting a protective technique
just because it looks like it would or could work. It requires the continual
testing of the limits of your emotional capabilities in a threatening and violent
environment.
Another method of attack would be for the opponent to confront
you at a very close range, employing psychological tactics. Your attacker needs
to be close so that you feel the full force of their aggressive tactic. These
tactics can vary greatly, but their underlying purpose is to engage your thought
processes and hence control your corresponding emotional reactions in some way,
to make you more vulnerable to attack. As in the ambush scenario, fear is a
major weapon in the arsenal of the attacker, who may adopt aggressive tactics,
where prodding, shoving, abusive and threatening language, and menacing, threatening
gestures may all be utilised to create fear and even panic. On the other hand,
the attacker may decide to adopt the very different strategy of appearing to
be non-threatening, by behaving in a disarming and deceptive manner. He may
ask you a seemingly harmless question designed not to upset you, but to distract
you in some way, thereby making you vulnerable to a sudden attack because you
are in a more relaxed state and off your guard. Here the attacker relies on
the ability to launch his attack without you being aware of their intention,
and again it is worth considering the distance this is best achieved from.
Distance Management
Amidst the endless variations and combinations of ambushes, surprise
attacks, and openly aggressive assaults, it is very important to bear in mind
that it is nearly always the attacker who dictates (or intends to dictate) the
physical distance at which the confrontation and assault will take place. It
is somewhat ludicrous to believe that this distance is the one usually depicted
in martial arts movies, or the regimented distance at which sporting competitors
begin their exchanges in tournaments. In reality, it is the distance where the
victim can be struck with little warning and the full impact of an aggressive
approach can be felt. It is the distance where one may engage another in polite
conversation, or to stop to ask for directions or the time. The distance is
almost, without exception, punching, kneeing, headbutting or stabbing distance.
It is only logical, from the attacker’s viewpoint to utilise this range. Afterall,
why would you allow someone to have the room to manoeuvre or recognise your
initial movement to strike them?
If you accept this notion, and from our personal experience,
and from the related
experiences of our peers, we believe it to be true, and if you
are serious in your intentions to teach or learn practical self-protection,
then this is the distance you will base most, if not all of your training strategies,
tactics, and power development drills for Personal Protection. It would
require enormous discipline to remain fully aware all the time, and the nature
of most societies would make it almost impossible to maintain a personal safety
area that would inhibit an attacker’s intention to get within striking distance,
so the ability to recognise ritualised patterns of assault behaviour is essential.
The Victim Syndrome
On their videotape entitled "The Pavement Arena",
Geoff Thompson and Peter Consterdine say that a booby trap or bomb is deemed
to be victim operated. So it is that in many instances an attack on yourself
can be said to be victim operated. You can make yourself a victim by your lack
of awareness, your meek demeanour and other body language. Once you understand,
and more importantly, practise the concepts and strategies of Personal Protection,
however, you will be able to project a more positive and confident image. It
will enable you to become more aware of someone’s intention to attack you. Put
yourself in the attacker's position, ...whom would you attack? Someone who presents
a formidable target, or a person who looks like a pushover?
December 1993
I had to return to my car in the dark. The area was renowned
for being dangerous at night and I was nervous to be alone. I walked on the
footpath close to the road and watched each door and alleyway for movement.
I walked into the car park and kept close to the middle of the driveway lest
someone was waiting in ambush. I would look over my shoulder as a matter of
routine whilst maintaining a steady, even pace. I was about twenty metres from
my car when I could make out two people near where I remembered parking my vehicle.
As I drew closer, I could see that they were at the rear of my car. One man
was crouched and was busying himself with my bike rack which was attached to
the car’s tow-bar. The other guy leaned casually on the boot of my car, smoking
a cigarette. I was about five metres away when the smoking man became aware
of me, and he looked in my direction and said, "G’day mate."
I was shocked. He seemed so casual and displayed no concern that
he and his friend had been caught in the act of stealing. The rest of the conversation
is lost to me, so confused by his manner was I that I doubted for a while that
it was even my car. It went along the lines of me saying, "Move away from my
car", and him answering, "Yeah right, ...f**k off!" This went back and forth
a couple of times, whilst the kneeling man working at the bike rack. Confusion
quickly turned to fear when the man who had been busy freeing my bike rack rose,
turned and moved towards my right. I had no idea as to what tool he had in his
hand and realised that my fear was fast becoming uncontrollable. I was unable
to make any rational decision. I was aware that I should be doing something
when the man leaning on the boot made the decision for me by flicking his cigarette
at me. As soon as it left his fingers, he leapt at me. I stepped toward him
and punched him twice in the face, knocking him backwards on to the bike rack.
There was a blur of movement to my right. My arm shot out and
I contacted the man with the tool’s arm. I heard a crack and experienced a flash
of light behind my eyes. I think that he overbalanced, as I was able to step
closer and began punching as fast and as hard as I could. I have no idea where
or how many times that I hit him, but I know that he hit me at least four times,
very hard! He slipped again and staggered backwards. I could see his head and
managed to land a few clean blows that had some effect. He continued to stagger
backward until he fell into a low hedge in the flowerbed that ringed the car
park. As he thrashed around, trying to regain his feet, I was able to repeatedly
punch him hard in the stomach and groin. The weight of his body, coupled with
his frenzied movement, caused him to break through the branches, and he fell
into a sitting position within the hedge. Although he could still raise his
hands, there was little that he could do to stop me from punching him in the
face. I knocked him into a stupor, then stepped back and stomped on his ankle.
I spun around, expecting his friend rushing toward me, only to
see that he was shuffling around, still at the rear of my car, reaching around
to his back. I walked over to him, shaking and with no idea of what I was about
to do next. As I got to within striking distance, I saw a man running towards
us, shouting. I had no idea what he was saying, only that he was waving his
hands around, but showing no signs of aggression. His behaviour distracted me
and I lost all interest in pursuing the fight. I was physically spent and thoroughly
exhausted. Despite an extremely high level of fitness, all my energy had been
used up in a few short seconds. The fight was over, the whole thing not lasting
more than a minute. I did not sleep well for a couple of weeks after that, I
was profoundly disturbed at my inability to handle the situation. In the aftermath,
I replayed the scenario repeatedly in my mind, in an effort to better understand
how I could have coped with the situation more effectively, and tried in vain
to rationalise my fear.
I came to realise that after years of studying the martial arts,
I had yet to learn how to control my fear, and that without the ability to control
my fear, I was destined to relive and replay my mismanagement of the situation
over and over again. I had been involved in many fights before this one, yet
I had never suffered the resultant disruption to my thinking or emotions. What
seemed to separate those encounters from this one was the need for tactical
positioning, a skill that I obviously lacked. This, coupled with the behaviour
of the men involved, triggered a progressive evolution of thinking that I was
completely untrained to deal with.
Andrew Williams
Emotional Control
Fear is the most overlooked aspect of any attack scenario. That
is to say, those who overlook or pay little attention to this aspect of a fight
could not have experienced an attack themselves, or are unwilling to admit to
feeling fear. Fear leaves one of the most lasting impressions after an attack.
The memories and biochemical residues are powerfully evident and profound. The
creation of fear in the victim is one of the major goals and weapons employed
by a would-be attacker. As such, any self defence system that ignores or plays
down this aspect cannot be regarded as realistic. In fact, martial arts instructors
who teach self defence tactics that are repetition/technique based, executed
on overly compliant partners, and do not take into account the effects of fear
in a life or death scenario, are possibly placing their students in a dangerous
position. When in a critical situation where fear is a factor, the student can
end up with a "log jam" of techniques and find it difficult to apply the appropriate
response as well as deal with the physical and emotional effects of fear. This
type of techniques-based training can also develop an "arm-lock" mentality.
An example of this occurs when the martial artist tries to fit a technique into
an inappropriate situation.
It is interesting to note the lack of understanding displayed
by some instructors where they suggest things like "fight like a tiger" or "have
the courage of a lion". This simplistic approach is ignorant at best and extremely
dangerous if the student believes that by simply thinking that he/she is a savage
beast he/she will magically adopt the level of courage and fighting prowess
attributed to the animal.
The attacker uses fear as a weapon. We will aim to rationalise
fear and thereby go some way towards negating its influence on the outcome of
an attack. In fact, when encouraged in the right manner, one can learn to harness
their own fear bio-chemical responses and effects to great personal benefit.
Proper consideration should also be given to the control of anger. Aggression
can be a useful tool when channelled correctly. However, anger is a sign of
a lack of mental control and can blind you to what is going on around you, affecting
your own intuitive responses. Needless to say, if there is more than one attacker,
you need to be conscious of all that is going on around you. If you are not
aware, you increase your chances of choosing an inappropriate action which may
have disastrous results if the people with whom you are dealing are serious
in their intentions to do you harm.
Control over your emotions is also required if your situation
has deteriorated and your fear has become completely invasive. It is useful
in such situations to be able to focus your thoughts around an image that will
give you the determination not to give in or surrender to your fears and therefore
the attack. For example, if you have been knocked to the ground and your thoughts
are in disarray and fear is taking control, you could use this image to help
crystallise your thoughts, a thought that would prompt you to act, to fight
on, or to take flight. It should be an image which has strong meaning for you
and one which gives you cause to take action.
What is Effective Personal Protection?
At the core of any good personal protection system are one or
two techniques, at most a handful, honed and developed using the principles
of simplicity, directness and efficiency. Given the opportunity,
these techniques should be applied with the intention of being first, being
fast and being ferocious.
Be honest and ask yourself if your system fits these criteria,
and if it doesn't, then maybe it's time to reassess your approach to Personal
Protection. Consider the following definitions:
SIMPLE: does not require analysis or thought processing;
is as automatic as blinking;
does not require balletic poise;
utilises the minimum number of movements.
DIRECT: follows the shortest distance from point A to B;
where possible, attacks the closest target with the nearest
weapon.
EFFICIENT: does not create targets for the attacker;
has minimal effect on balance/stability;
uses economy of motion, achieving the expected outcome with minimal
expenditure of energy.
THE PROTECTION LADDER AND LEVELS OF AWARENESS
Levels of Awareness
It is the ability to constantly monitor your surroundings that
affords you the greatest level of protection from attack. As with most things
of value, the functional levels of protective awareness take time and effort
to develop.
Colour Coding
One technique that can be used to help develop a better understanding
of the different levels of awareness is a visualised colour system. Such systems
have been utilised with great success in combat pistol instruction and are easily
applied in the realms of self-protection. It is also a system that Thompson
and Consterdine have tailored to suit their own protection method and has proved
inspirational in the development of our model.
The colour guide can be seen as an ascending ladder (see next
page) and has been prepared to help readers to understand the various levels
of awareness, or the "colour condition" that they are in, in relation to a threat,
the form and content of these threats, and the likely consequences.
Levels of Awareness (in summary)
Condition White: Condition White can be seen as the level
of awareness that is dangerously low. Unfortunately, it is the condition occupied
by most people most of the time. To be in Condition White means that your chances
of being aware of any threat to yourself are greatly reduced. The resulting
inability to perceive a threat, for example, as a result of being mentally distracted,
will dramatically increase the chances of being taken by surprise, with little
or no chance of avoiding an attack or issuing a counter-attack.
THE PROTECTION LADDER AND LEVELS OF AWARENESS
CONDITION RED
FIGHT OR FLIGHT
THE PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE
CONDITION ORANGE
RESPONSE TO THREAT
MAKING A DECISION
CONDITION YELLOW
BASIS FOR PERSONAL SECURITY
AWARENESS - EVALUATION - AVOIDANCE
CONDITION WHITE
LACK OF AWARENESS
THE VICTIM SYNDROME
Condition Yellow: By developing a calm, subliminal awareness,
not paranoia, you will be aware of a change in the environment and have
time to adjust. Being "quietly alert" is another way of putting it.
Condition Orange: When a change occurs and you are aware
of it, you give yourself a chance to avoid or counter a threat. In practical
terms, you will be able very quickly to evaluate the threat and put in place
strategies and tactics to avoid or otherwise deal with the threat in an effective
and efficient manner.
Condition Red: Fight or Flight - the moment of truth. If
you have to fight, be first, be fast and be ferocious.
It is far better to be pro-active than reactive. Seize the initiative before
it is too late.
Visualisation
It can be useful to get a visualisation of the awareness levels
in your mind, using the colour code as outlined above. When applied correctly,
this will enhance your decision making process.
NB: Condition Red must not be visualised as, say, a red
flashing light overlaid with words like "emergency" or "battle stations". That
would presuppose that there is still time left to prepare for action. Instead,
Condition Red should be seen as an automatic, virtually instant trigger for
full blooded, totally committed action.
Levels of Awareness (in detail)
Condition White - Having little or no awareness
Attack can take numerous forms, eg.:
Murder
Rape
Assault
Robbery
Abduction
All these can be inter-related and the threat posed by a thief
should not be thought of as less serious than the threat posed by a rapist,
as a thief can easily become a rapist or murderer. Therefore every and any threat
should be taken seriously and dealt with following the method which forms the
basis for developing a sense of personal security (see Condition Yellow).
For example, if you are unaware, your attacker can use two major weapons, fear
and surprise, against you. In fact, your lack of awareness has the potential
to turn you into a target. Condition White (being unaware) must therefore
be avoided at all costs, and at all times.
Condition Yellow - Forming A Basis for Personal Security
To attain Condition Yellow, you need to have developed
a subliminal level of awareness (it must be stressed that this is not
to be confused with a sense of paranoia). Subliminal awareness can be developed
in a number of ways, however the most accessible of these is a standard technique
used in training advanced tactical drivers. It is called "commentary driving",
and is a procedure whereby one has a conscious recognition of the changing environment.
The same can be done whilst walking. The idea is to verbalise your changing
surroundings as you move along, noting as many things as possible, such as the
traffic conditions, weather, scenery, people in your environment, areas that
could be used for concealment, and so on. By using this simple technique, and
depending on your seriousness, it can take from one to four weeks to develop
a conscious, continuous and accurate recognition of your surroundings. Once
this is done, there is no need to verbalise anything, it will occur naturally
on a subliminal level.
There are a number of complementary drills which can be used
to develop and enhance your subliminal awareness. These include:
1. Peripheral awareness drills
2. Photo-retentive recognition drills
3. Recognition of threatening body language (static and dynamic)
4. Recognition of pre-fight rituals (verbal and physical)
5. Victim recognition/threat evaluation drills
6. Immediate threat recognition drills
7. Development and testing of a pre-plan
8. Development of acronyms, eg: ‘KEYS’
Karefully
Evaluate
Your
Surroundings
The ability to maintain cognitive awareness is indicative of
Condition Yellow and is of vital importance. It provides a strong foundation
from which you can develop your personal security through:
Threat Awareness
Threat Evaluation
Threat Avoidance
It is important to note here that a tactical evaluation is only
valid if the appraisal of your part in the scenario is realistic and honest.
At this stage, it may still be possible to walk away from the
threat or danger, and Threat Avoidance may be your best option. However,
you may not be able to control the situation and may find yourself in a position
where your level of awareness is heightened to Condition Orange.
Condition Orange - Threat Escalation / Making the Decision
This is in some respects the most crucial condition that you
will find yourself in. Having come from the personal security basis of Condition
Yellow, with the understanding of threat awareness, evaluation and avoidance,
you are now faced with making the decision!
Threat Evaluation and Avoidance
This is a tactical situation and requires a critical assessment.
If your training has led you to believe that you will somehow be able to control
yourself and the situation without your training ever having placed you in harm’s
way, then you have been misinformed. To truly understand how the pressure of
a confrontation (or the potential of a confrontation) can effect your decision-making
process, you need to duplicate the pressure in the dojo or kwoon. There are
vast differences between sparring in an institution where you know that a fight
will not deteriorate to the point where your opponent is going to bite you or
stab you after you are knocked to the ground, and when these things become a
very real possibility.
Psychological Tactics
Attackers often perform patterns of behaviour before they commence
their assault. If you can identify these patterns you may even be able to implement
your own psychological tactics and gain better control of the situation.
Whether they know it or not, your attacker will probably employ
one of the following ploys when approaching you:
1. Disarming / Deceptive (eg. asking for the time or directions,
etc.) When using this ploy your attacker is not only trying to lull you into
a false sense of security, but also attempting to draw your attention away from
his "line up" (ie: his intentions, and the position/posture from which he intends
to launch his attack). If successfully executed, where you are taken by surprise,
the effects can be devastating. Not only will you be unprepared physically for
the attack and most likely receive the full brunt of the blow, but, more importantly
you will be unprepared emotionally. Here, fear is your enemy, and to now be
able to bring the resultant rush of adrenaline under control will be extremely
difficult. There are, however, methods of training that can bring about the
spontaneous control of adrenaline and, consequently, you will be more able to
fight from this disadvantageous position.
2. Aggressive (using verbal and/or physical threat behaviour)
There are many ways to display aggression. Understanding patterns of behaviour
is extremely important. Verbal aggression (whether your attacker understands
it or not) is a means whereby your attacker can engage your mind, resulting
in a multitude of effects. These range from a general feeling of unease all
the way through to blind panic, thus disabling one’s ability to react instinctively.
Physically threatening behaviour is perhaps the most frightening and potent
weapon that the attacker can employ. While many of us have been in a verbal
argument, most people have not experienced the type of physical contact that
may be a precursor to a full-blown assault.
Of course we can talk about how we could cope with such a situation,
but unless you practise and develop strategies to deal with physical and verbal
abuse as part of a pre-fight ritual, your skill in dealing with this scenario
will be lacking. The fight can be won or lost before the first punch is thrown,
yet this often discussed aspect of fighting goes largely unpractised. For instance,
how do you maintain the optimal distance to launch your own pre-emptive strike
without moving into kicking or grappling range? How do you maintain a tactile
reference that allows you to subtly monitor your assailant’s intentions as well
as controlling a bridging arm? If there is more than one attacker, how do you
maintain or even attain a superior tactical position if your attackers are not
compliant and/or mobile and aggressive? The answer is probably, "You cannot!",
unless it is a skill that you have developed and practised under pressure. Another
idea to keep in mind is that you can gain some understanding of your enemies
fears by recognising the means he uses in an effort to frighten you.
Armed and Aggressive
If it were suggested to you that the opponent you were about
to face was carrying a concealed weapon, that the attacker had every intention
of using the weapon (let’s say that he has a butcher’s boning knife), do you
believe that you would then proceed in a similar fashion as you would if you
were in ignorance of the weapon? You would be well advised to treat every
attacker as armed, whether a weapon is in evidence or not.
Have you been in a threatening situation where people around
you were unknown to you? If a fight had started could you discount the possibility
that those around you would not join in with an attack against you? Just as
weapons can be concealed, so can your potential assailants. Treat every attack
as a multiple attack.
The above would suggest that fighting should be avoided because
of the incalculable and hidden variables, however if you have to fight you should
dispatch your attacker(s) as vigorously and quickly as possible, with little
remorse. Avoid going to the ground because once there, it is difficult to get
up if you are outnumbered. There is now a huge increase in the popularity of
grappling arts. There can be no doubt as to their effectiveness, but arts that
seek to take their opponents to the ground at the earliest opportunity may place
the practitioner at a disadvantage, especially if those who are attacking them
are prepared to do so with absolutely no consideration for gentlemanly fair-play,
and no regard of the consequences.
Remember, any tactic that the assailant uses is designed to engage
your conscious thought process. You are left vulnerable if this is allowed to
happen and must guard against such tactics. By being aware of these psychological
tactics you can also employ similar and additional counter tactics to engage
your attacker's thought processes. You too can be:
1. Disarming / Deceptive (eg. asking a counter or nonsense
question)
2. Aggressive / Demonstrative ("call their bluff" through
the use of verbal or
physical intimidation). Remember where ignorance is common, arrogance
is king.
3. Submissive (this is an additional tactic, ie. a "pretend"
submissiveness to
lull your attacker into a false sense of security by switching
off his
adrenaline).
Fear Control
The methodology of Fear Control which is presented below
is based on experience and research, and we would encourage the reader to research
their own experience, and that of their peers, openly and honestly. Central
to any discussion of the response to a perceived threat is to understand the
physiological responses that the body has when a potential menace is recognised.
One of the first things to realise is that your thinking stimulates the physiological
reaction, and that it is your own thinking which can therefore control and harness
this response. "Fear is in the mind of the beholder."
Fear is experienced as a sudden release of adrenaline (a combination
of two chemicals, Epinephrine and Norepinephrine), followed immediately by the
associated physiological responses. If left uncontrolled, these responses can
have a devastating effect on both the body and the mind. Most of us have been
conditioned to associate the effects of these adrenalines with fear, rather
than as a means of providing a biological "overdrive", commonly referred to
as the "fight and flight syndrome".
Fear can be thought paralysing, causing one to act irrationally,
or not to act at all, thus giving the attacker a devastating advantage, ie.
the ability to attack you without fear of reprisal. To learn how to control
fear, one must confront fear, to move outside of one’s comfort zone. This can
be done through the creation of a Fear Pyramid, whereby you confront
your own fears, starting with the mildest at the bottom of the pyramid, and
working up to your worst nightmare at the top.
The idea is not to rid yourself of fear per se, but to get used
to or desensitised to its harmful effects on you and instead learn how to harness
their effects and make them a useful tool. As already mentioned, fear is merely
a biochemical reaction to a perceived threat. It can in fact heighten your awareness
as well as prepare your body for action. These are useful reactions to have
under control. A requirement of a more complete training regime would be to
acclimatise its participants to the effects of adrenaline, and if structured
correctly, slowly condition the students to make effective use of it’s effects,
some of which are:
1. Vasoconstriction, causing diminished blood supply to the non-fight
or flight
organs, eg. the skin. This enables more blood to be pumped into
skeletal
muscle
2. Increased heart rate and force of contraction, leading to
subsequent
increased blood supply to the muscles
3. Dilation of lung airways, enabling increase in oxygen uptake
4. Increase in brain sugars (glucose)
5. Dilation of the pupils, increasing depth perception
6. Increased mobilisation of liver carbohydrate stores and the
stimulation of the
production of lactic acid from glycogen in the muscle. The lactic
acid
produced can be used in the liver to manufacture new foodstuffs
(glucose
and glycogen)
7. An anaesthetic effect reportedly associated with its release.
The effects that the release of adrenaline can cause, that are
usually associated with fear are:
1. Constriction of vessels in the skin (pallid complexion), mucous
membranes
(dry mouth), and kidneys
2. Uncontrolled high levels of adrenaline may cause to excessive
carbohydrate
metabolism, leading to hypoglycaemia (the feeling of weakness
often
associated with moments of fear)
3. Lactic acid produced at the muscle site enhances the feeling
of weakness
and the loss of endurance capability in the muscle.
It is the ability to recognise adrenaline’s effects that is our
greatest ally when dealing with what the celebrated Chinese strategist Sun
Zi called the "Inner Opponent", and he advocated learning
as much as possible about this so as to overcome the negative responses that
are created by it in battle. The release of adrenaline should therefore be seen
as a positive response to the perception of a threat, and therefore encouraged
in training. There is not an elite fighting force in the world that does not
duplicate the pressures of combat whilst training. Sparring, and in the case
of Wing Chun, ‘Chi Sau’ practise, are usually too regimented and controlled,
and both are too bound by protocol to successfully reproduce the emotional pressure
that occurs when a threat is not generated at our choosing.
March 1998
As a professional Fire Fighter you come to expect the unexpected.
You might be "turned-out" to a yard fire and on arrival find a house fully involved
with fire and people trapped inside. And so it was in March of 1998 when, at
approximately 1.00am, the crew of Canning Vale Fire Station’s Pump and Light
Tanker were turned-out to a grass fire on Chapman Way in Canning Vale. I was
the passenger in the Light Tanker, which is a Toyota Landcruiser fitted with
a rear-mounted 650 litre water tank specifically designed to suppress grass
and scrub fires. The Light Tanker follows the larger Pump, a 12 tonne Scannia,
in which sit an officer and driver.
When we arrived at Chapman Road we found a street party taking
place, involving some 1600 people, mostly young men, most of whom appeared intoxicated.
The Officer in the leading vehicle decided that we had best leave the area as
the partygoers were clearly upset by our presence. It was quickly obvious that
we would be ill advised to attempt to reverse or u-turn in order to quit the
area, the road being too narrow and lined with partygoers cars, plus the ever
increasing presence of the now agitated partygoers, so we came to a halt.
Some 50 metres in front of us was the main body of the crowd
who were, as yet, unaware of our presence, despite the fact that our vehicles
were slowly being surrounded by a gathering crowd which was decidedly unfriendly.
With no police present, our options were severely limited, so the Officer in
Charge communicated over the radio that we should push gently forward through
the crowd to escape the area. As the Pump started to move forward a small fire
was lit in the grass next to our vehicle. The summer had been long and hot,
with many days reaching temperatures in excess of 40 degrees Centigrade, and
even small fires had the potential to quickly develop into something that threatened
life and property. There was no way that Phil, my driver, and I could ignore
the fire, so we stopped and exited the Tanker.
The fire was indeed growing in size, and people had started to
push back from the fire’s edge. The hose-reel for the Tanker is attached to
the rear of the truck, so Phil and I had to push and shove through the crowd
to get to it. A small band of men had taken the branch (ie. the nozzle) and
were running the hose down the road. Up until now the crowd had done no more
than hinder our progress and be slightly abusive, but at this point I felt that
they now believed that we were going to interfere with their fun, and their
behaviour became noticeably more aggressive. I looked back towards the fire,
which had now grown to a threatening size, and with an increased sense of urgency,
I began to pursue the group with the branch and hose up the road, leaving behind
the crowd around the Tanker.
A small group of young men stepped out from between a row of
cars and blocked my path. I had no time to waste so my intention was to push
through them in an effort to regain the hose. They did not break ranks as I
neared, but instead stepped towards and around me. Without a word they started
throwing punches, some of which landed, but most of which bounced off harmlessly.
My only reaction was to remain calm, show no fear, and make a determined effort
to regain the hose and branch. After the initial onslaught of blows, a couple
of the guys stepped back. I could not tell you what they were thinking, but
they did look surprised. I told them to move out of the way and pointed back
at the fire, which had now started to cross a paddock and run towards a house.
I asked them if it was their intention to let the house burn down. This had
the desired effect as I was then able to force my way through their tight cordon.
There was much the same reaction and action when I got to the
group with the branch, but I did finally manage to retrieve it, run back to
the fire and extinguish it. Whilst doing that I was assaulted twice more, but
my only real concern was to make sure that the house and the people inside it
were not placed in any further danger. The crowd gathering around Phil and me
had swelled to a point where I could no longer see the Pump’s position. A few
of them now started to throw bottles and Phil had to take cover in our vehicle.
I was cut off from the Tanker by another group who "got stuck in". At least
when that was happening, no one threw bottles at me.
As I forced my way back to the Tanker, I saw that there was a
large number of people pulling equipment off the Pump, some of which is extremely
expensive, most of which is essential to our job. I yelled at Phil to follow
me to the Tanker, and on foot I pushed towards the people with the equipment.
I managed to wrestle some of it back, but by now there was a veritable storm
of bottles raining down on the Tanker and myself. This forced most of the crowd
back when a couple of them were hit by "friendly fire". It was definitely time
to get out. Phil had a broken bottle pushed through his window, narrowly missing
his face, but he remained calm and drove at a pace that matched my walking.
We forced a way through the crowd to the other side of the party, not wanting
to stop and present a stationary target, and finally passed through this gauntlet
which was some 200 metres long. We returned to the station and I was then off
to hospital. Thankfully the rest of the crew were physically unharmed
Why didn’t I retaliate? Why hadn’t we turned our hoses on the
crowd? Why didn’t we drive our vehicle into the densely packed people? Discipline!
I was mentally aware through the whole affair but at no stage did I behave or
think recklessly. I controlled and used the adrenaline rushing through my body.
I remained calm so as not to provoke any retaliation from the partygoers and
further expose Phil or myself to danger.
Had we not behaved in such a disciplined fashion, it is my belief
, and that of the men I work with and the police investigating the incident,
that the repercussions and retaliation we could have suffered would have been
far greater. Phil later told me that he had been terrified, but had taken strength
from my apparent calm and control, both of which I have developed within the
confines of a martial arts club. By training in a realistic manner, which is
pressure filled, my ability to cope is constantly strained and tested. It is
because of this that I have been able to master some of my demons and am now
on the long path to beating my "Inner Opponent".
Andrew Williams
Responses
If you allow your attacker to initiate the action then he will
usually dictate your response. This will allow him to determine the distance
at which the altercation will take place, and this may not be the distance where
you can best apply your protective principles. Many arts now talk of "bridging
the gap" or "making distance". This may be relevant in a match
fight or an organised competition, but in the street, if your attacker wishes
to truly hurt you, he will have to close the distance to where he can best dictate
the terms of the altercation. Thus it is imperative that you know how to deal
with your attacker at kicking or punching range because if you cannot, the fight
may then go to grappling range and once there it would be almost impossible
to return to any other range. The implementation of a decisive posture
will help to maintain your preferred distance and enable you to position yourself
whereby you can launch a pre-emptive strike. Given the right sort of
training, this tactic will finish the fight instantly. You need to place yourself
in a position that offers little option of attack for your opponent, yet allows
you to "line up" on him, positioning yourself so that you can achieve
your objective without exposing your intention.
Your "line up" will influence:
1. the attacker’s perception of you;
2. ranges and tools (fighting ranges occur at kicking, punching
and grappling
distance);
3. targets, both yours and your attacker's.
A Decisive Posture
How you can, and will respond, will very largely be dependant
on your posture when confronted by your attacker. To effectively "line up"
your opponent requires a decisive posture. Whether the fight is won or
lost may well be determined by the posture (physical and mental) taken in the
lead up to the altercation. Effective components of a decisive posture,
that allows for the option and delivery of a pre-emptive strike, include
all of the following:
1. it is deceptive in its martial intent;
2. it allows for effective mobility and distance control;
3. it is based on the ability to deliver an extremely powerful
blow from a short
distance without a perceptible "wind-up";
4. it allows for the application of techniques that are simple,
direct and
efficient;
5. it enables your hands to be positioned to appear innocuous,
yet provide for a distance management arm, which can also serve as a tactile
reference with regard to your attacker's movements and intentions;
6. it enables either or both arms, from whatever their position,
to strike effective targets without "telegraphing";
7. it facilitates the option of the acceptable tactic of the
pre-emptive strike;
8. it is trained to be a trigger for action, ie: by adopting
the correct posture, you are putting into operation, a sequence of flexible
movements designed to
enable you to protect yourself efficiently;
9. it is designed to be utilised in most situations. You should
not require a different stance for each different confrontation, as all that
would achieve is
the inclusion of yet another variable into an already complex
calculation;
10. most importantly, it is a trigger for psychological action
(the discipline of your
training will be pivotal in your ability to act decisively)
When deciding on a decisive posture, one should avoid
the notion of being able to block and then counter or control the opponent.
If you accept the idea that your attacker will try to gain a position where
he can launch his own pre-emptive strike, then you will be at a distance
that would suggest you would lack the reaction speed to block a punch. The Wing
Chun maxim that "Attack is the best form of defence" is most definitely
the method that serves our purpose, and is the cornerstone of the "Wong
Shun Leung Method", whereby every combination of movements involves
at least one attacking technique, never only defensive actions.
Condition Red - Action!!!!
The threat is unavoidable, ...it is now "the moment of truth".
Using a "trigger for action", which might be a verbal prompt, or even your own
decisive posture, and given the opportunity, you should apply the acceptable
option of the pre-emptive strike. For the pre-emptive strike to
be pursued successfully, one would need it to be applied with what is commonly
described as "extreme prejudice". In training the emotional wherewithal
to do this, it may help to keep in mind this mantra:
BE FIRST
BE FAST
BE FEROCIOUS
It is absolutely essential that you totally overwhelm your opponent
and that you deliver your attacks with the sort of venom which will ensure this
aim. If the fight is on, if not totally committed to the attack being launched,
you are destined to become the victim rather than the victor. Is there a component
in your training that achieves this? Do you train in a fashion that places you
in the frame of mind that allows you to feel the discipline and commitment that
encourages you to "win at all costs", lest you suffer the consequences?
To this end, it is crucial that you make all drills, including striking
practice, take on a reality that approximates the realism of the street. While
attacking the striking pad or punching bag, role play the scenario, get into
the right frame of mind, and EXPLODE when the strike is launched. In
addition to the above, make sure that your practise sessions only make use of
techniques that are:
SIMPLE
DIRECT
EFFICIENT
Multiple Attackers
Just as every attacker should be dealt with as if he were armed, so too should
every attack be dealt with as if it has the potential to become an attack from
more than one aggressor. This reason alone would determine that grappling or
"going to the mat" should be avoided at all costs on the street. Psychological
tactics, decisive postures and emotional control should still be employed, but
you must quickly recognise the attacker who presents the greatest threat to
you. He is the person you should deal with first. It may not always be the largest
of your attackers who represents this threat. It is the person who can strike
you the quickest and with the least amount of potential resistance or reaction
from you. This again illustrates the need to develop devastatingly powerful
blows, and a system to deliver them. If you do not drop your man quickly, no
amount of ‘Chi Sau’ will enable you to cross arms with multiple attackers.
Thompson and Consterdine refer to their management of this situation as dealing
with the "red letter syndrome". The bill that represents the greatest
threat to you, eg. to cut off your electricity supply, is the one printed in
red. It is the red one you deal with first.
IN SUMMARY
Having between them over 50 years of traditional training, tournament
fighting (both national and international), and professional "hands on" security
work under their belts, Geoff Thompson and Peter Consterdine hold the view that
"90% of what is taught and practised in traditional martial arts today
will not work on the street". They therefore advocate the need to re-assess
training methods and self-protection concepts and to start putting reality back
into martial arts training, to apply a proven handful of reliable techniques
to combat situations based on an understanding of training theory and methodologies,
coupled with a sound knowledge of biomechanics and psychology.
Just as one cannot expect reasonable levels of improvement in
the haphazard application of a physical training regime, one cannot expect credible
results from the random implementation of emotional training. The instructor
needs to consider the emotional needs of each student and construct and implement
a flexible training model. Students of the martial art of Wing Chun are uniquely
placed to take advantage of the concepts of Personal Protection. They
are already practising a martial method dedicated almost exclusively to fighting.
The followers of the "Wong Shun Leung Way" of Wing Chun have a
distinct advantage in having, as their mentor, a man who pioneered a method
based upon his experiences in countless real life fights. He brought these experiences
into every aspect of his Wing Chun teaching, advocating the injection of a great
deal of realism into his training sessions and seminars. Most importantly, sifu
Wong advocated the natural application of internalised physical concepts and
a flexible approach to "in-fight thinking", rather than the rote learning of
set techniques or responses, as is in evidence to anyone lucky enough to have
trained with him. Thus, his teachings easily lend themselves to the Personal
Protection concept, and vice-versa.
Martial artists of other disciplines would do well to look at
their own approach to self-protection and ask themselves what they could do
to make their methods more street effective. It takes more than flashy techniques
to survive a street encounter. What is needed are sound concepts, effective
and realistic training methods, and a complete understanding of the psychology
of the attacker, as well as oneself. We need to conquer, or at least begin to
recognise our fears, to gain control of our emotions, to develop threat awareness
and how to deal with it effectively. As Sun Zi wrote in his celebrated "Art
of War" over 2000 years ago,
"Know the other and know yourself:
One hundred challenges without danger;
Know not the other and yet know yourself:
One triumph for one defeat;
Know not the other and know not yourself:
Every challenge is certain peril".
It is, or should be, the goal of every sincere instructor to equip his or her
students with the skills to survive. It is the wish of the authors of this article
to encourage, at the very least, a discussion of the protective methods now
employed in your school. We would hope that the concept of Personal Protection
presented on these pages will lead to a return to reality and practicality in
the martial arts, regardless of style. Good luck in developing your potential,
and that of your students!
About the authors: Andrew Williams has trained
extensively in two different Wing Chun systems, had his skills tested in numerous
real life encounters, and is fast being recognised as an innovative Wing Chun
instructor. Williams is currently assisting Rolf Clausnitzer of the 'Wing
Chun Academy of Western Australia'. Clausnitzer was the late Sifu
Wong Shun Leung's first foreign student and co-author (with Greco Wong)
of the first ever English language introduction to Wing Chun. David Peterson,
principal instructor of the 'Melbourne Chinese Martial Arts Club', has
been publicly acknowledged by Sifu Wong as one of his outstanding overseas students/instructors,
acting as Sifu Wong’s personal translator during five seminar tours to Australia.
Peterson is also a freelance writer whose articles have appeared in many Australian
and international journals, and more recently, on several Internet sites around
the world.
|